International Public Management Network
What's New
Photo Gallery
About IPMN IPM Journal IPM Review Research Members News and Events Contact Us
 

IPMN Newsletter 1999
Number 4

Dear IPMNers

Our network community is growing. The membership database which can be found at / holds 360 records. Many of our members have research or teaching contacts and use the IPMN as a basis for their international activities. One example is a group of researchers organised by a German group (IPMN members Frieder Naschold, Christoph Reichard, Werner Jann) who did a study about Central Government Reforms in seven countries: USA, Sweden, Denmark, UK, Germany, New Zealand, and Switzerland. Others are hosting visiting research fellows. The IPMN turns out to be a great platform for international contacts of any kind. Let's go on like this!

Short time before the new millennium starts, two of our IPMN member colleagues report about the latest developments in their respective countries. That's exactly what our network wants: have as many people as possible contribute to our joint knowledge about the international perspectives on public management. The countries have been selected by coincidence, and we are certain that many other interesting reports could be on the way. Please feel free to send me your own country's report, and we will add it to the next newsletter!

Mexico

*********

MEXICAN MANAGERIAL REFORM: AND OVERVIEW AND FUTURE STEPS

The administration of President Zedillo has launched an important project of administrative reform, perhaps the most (at least formally) ambitious and integral ever: the "Program for the Public Administration Modernization 1995-2000" (1996).

This program inaugurates long forgotten words in the Mexican public sector: accountability, citizen rights, information rights, and evaluation. After a diagnostic, the program proposes two objectives:

 

  1. - To transform Federal Public Administration into an organization that acts efficiently and with efficacy through a new culture of service.

 

  1. - To fight against corruption and impunity, through preventing mechanisms and promoting human resources capacities.

The program proposes four different sub-programs: Citizen Participation and Service, Administrative Decentralization, Evaluation and Measurement of Public Management, and Professionalization and Ethics of Public Officers.

Several programs and strategies have been implemented since then. Here we only discuss some of the challenges this program is facing in terms of two different key categories: accountability and civil service.

Accountability: the program enhances in the discourse the question of accountability. Basically in the presentation and in the diagnostic. However, the subprograms barely refer to the impact of the actions upon this issue. Citizen participation subprogram actions refer basically on better information regarding public services, reduction of required procedures, and the necessity of public agencies on monitoring their "clients". There is no attempt of requiring a large transformation of the way government controls information regarding impacts, costs, and budgets assigned to programs or services. There is no action programmed where "clients" could have real control over the process and results of the evaluation of the public agency. Decentralization subprogram actions emphasize the improvement of conditions for the supply of public services and the flexible capacity that public institutions should have to attend new necessities efficiently. The apparent assumption is that more accountability would be naturally produced by the better technical distribution of resources and responsibilities. Accountability is kept as an internal affair, where efficiency is more important than a wide-open system of information for the public. The subprogram Evaluation and Measurement of the public management actions enunciates the necessity of developing an integral system of information and new performance indicators. However, the subprogram proposes these systems for internal control. Better information to improve internal management, clear objectives and measurable outcomes for internal evaluation, performance indicators to guide the management decision-making process. There is no proposal regarding better ways of controlling public actions from citizens or Congress, for example. No reference of external evaluation of impacts on society of public programs. The basic emphasis is upon internal management decision-making process.

Civil Service: the subprogram for the Professionalization and Ethic of Public Service enunciates along waited mechanism for the implementation of a public service career in Mexico. However, the program is still very general, inducing all public agencies to define their procedures for hiring and developing their human resources. Now is 1999, and still diverse parts of government have been incapable of agreeing in some way to propose a program for civil service.

In addition to these elements, in 1997 a new program for budgeting began to be implemented. Taking the ministry of Treasury as a base, budget is going to be defined among public organizations through a definition of outcomes and outputs. These outputs and outcomes are going to be the principal elements (through the creation of indicators of performance) to be considered in the future for the definition of budget levels of different public organizations. It is expected for next year that the System of Performance Evaluation would be implemented within a sample of public organizations.

DAVID ARELLANO GAULTArellano@dis1.cide.mx

Finland

*********

1999 Developments of Public Management in Finland

The Government's resolution on governance and public management (April) spelled out the main principles for the future: high-quality services, good governance, and responsible civil society. The main guideline for the future public management is the differentiation between three state functions: (1) core functions based on classical administrative values, (2) public business functions based on business values, and (3) public service functions based on service values. Political governance is to vary according to these three sets of values. As in the three previous Governments, also the new Government appointed in the spring 1999 has a special ministerial working group responsible for steering of public management reforms. The ongoing EU presidency has weakened the priority of developing public management to some extent. One of the most important ongoing projects concentrates on the possible reform of the structure of central government. It includes a survey to ministries, and an international task force (Guy B. Peters, IPMN member Geert Bouckaert, Derry Ormond) set up for the comparative analysis of the relevant developments in other countries. Other projects cover several themes like

  • the strengthening of ministries as the staff of the Government and leaders of their administrative branch- the future position of development and research centres located in the central government

  • the improvement of management by results (including international comparison of 3-4 countries)

  • new alternative management instruments in public administration, and

  • the reform of task force (committee) institution.

In addition to this, civil service ethics is being empirically studied by a survey to state agencies, and the experiences of agency boards with the representatives of ministries and other external organizations are being assessed by a survey to all the boards. The legislation and administrative procedures related to electronic transactions with public agencies, electronic documents and electronic signature as well as ID card and Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) are being completed. After that citizens may apply for an electronic ID card and use it for officially binding transactions with government, provided that they have an access to Internet and that the agencies have customer service solutions based on generic PKI services. 1.12. onwards the salaries of all the public servants have been public - and published by the media. Right now there is public discussion on how the State and municipalities will be able to compete with the private sector about new employees with high-level competencies when the major retiring effect of public service personnel begins to strengthen in first ten years of the new millennium. As in many other western countries, the higher salaries of the public sector tend to be lower than in the private sector, while the lower salaries are quite competitive.

Turo Virtanen

In the name of the IPMN coordinating team, I wish all of you a Happy New Millennium!

Kuno Schedler

University of St. Gallen

 


What's New | Photo Gallery | About IPMN | International Public Management Journal | International Public Management Review | Research | Members
News and Events | Contact Us

Site Powered by Willamette University